PoliticsHow To Avoid 'Absolutely Catastrophic' COVID Mistakes

How To Avoid ‘Absolutely Catastrophic’ COVID Mistakes


On October 4, 2020, when COVID-19 was raging, American schools were mostly shuttered, and vaccines were believed to be years away—a team of top researchers at the world’s most prestigious universities, including Stanford’s Jay Bhattacharya, Harvard’s Martin Kulldorff, and Oxford’s Sunetra Gupta—published the Great Barrington Declaration, a controversial open letter challenging the official U.S. response of lockdowns and government control of ever-larger parts of the economy and everyday life.

Recognizing that COVID overwhelmingly affected elderly Americans and others with specific, identifiable health conditions, they called for a policy of “focused protection,” in which the vulnerable would be kept safe and the rest of us, especially children and young adults, would be able to get on with our lives.

The response at the very highest levels of government was quick and draconian. Francis Collins, then the director of the National Institutes of Health, wrote a private email to Anthony Fauci, which was later obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, denouncing Bhattacharya, Kulldorff, and Gupta as “fringe epidemiologists” who deserved to be the subject of a media “takedown.”

“Big tech outlets like Facebook and Google followed suit, suppressing our ideas, falsely deeming them ‘misinformation,’ says Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford who also holds a Ph.D. in economics. “I started getting calls from reporters asking me why I wanted to ‘let the virus rip,’ when I had proposed nothing of the sort. I was the target of racist attacks and death threats.”

I sat down with Bhattacharya to talk about what it was like to be at the very center of an official effort to suppress heterodox thinking about the pandemic, why he believes he and his Great Barrington Declaration co-authors have been vindicated, and whether the public health establishment can ever recover from ongoing revelations of incompetence, malfeasance, and politically motivated decision-making. He also discusses how the centralization of science funding encourages dangerous groupthink, why he believes in mRNA vaccines but remains staunchly anti-mandate, and why he stopped wearing masks a long time ago.





Original Source Link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

“In Sum, the Problem With [the Same-Sex Marriage Cases] Is That They Recognize Only Two-Person Relationships”

The decision is yesterday's West 49th St., LLC v. O'Neill, decided by New York Civil Court Judge Karen...

Readers discuss colors and spikes in the James Webb Space Telescope’s images and more

Space palettes The stunning first pictures from the James Webb Space Telescope provide the deepest and clearest look yet...

Phoenix real estate firm on a roll in Austin area, with another home rental community planned

NexMetro is credited with being a pioneer in the current build-to-rent trend and as of 2020 had invested...

Fiona Knocks Out Power With Hurricane-Strength Winds In Atlantic Canada

HALIFAX, Nova Scotia (AP) — Fiona knocked out power to more than 500,000 customers in Atlantic Canada Saturday,...

A Sweet, Slightly Clumsy Vampire Dramedy [Fantastic Fest]

Part of the fun of "Blood Relatives" is how Segan plays around with established vampire mythology. Yes, vampires...

Must Read

As Trump Steals Secrets, Marjorie Taylor Greene File Biden Articles Of Impeachment

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is calling for...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you