PoliticsObscenity (Including as to Minors) and "the Work Taken...

Obscenity (Including as to Minors) and “the Work Taken as a Whole”


The Court of Mist and Fury / Gender Queer controversy is a good opportunity to note an important legal principle: Under modern American law, a work can only be “obscene” and therefore constitutionally unprotected—or “obscene as to minors,” and therefore constitutionally unprotected when distributed to minors—if it’s basically pornographic taken as a whole.

A quotation from Voltaire in the flyleaf of a book will not constitutionally redeem an otherwise obscene publication.” The rule once seemed to be that, “to be smut, it must be ut- / terly without redeeming social importance,” but that is no longer so.

But, conversely, a few sexual scenes in a work likewise don’t make a publication obscene. The question is whether its dominant theme appeals to the “prurient interest,” which is to say a “shameful or morbid” interest in sex. (The government must also show that the work is patently offensive under contemporary community standards, and that, taken as a whole, it lacks serious value.) Even Justice Scalia, who was open to pretty substantial restrictions on pornographic material, acknowledged this:

[In our obscenity precedents], we rejected the approach previously adopted by some courts, which would permit the banning of an entire literary work on the basis of one or several passages that in isolation could be considered obscene. Instead, we said, “the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole” must appeal to prurient interest.

(He in turn was quoting Roth v. United States (1957), which was modified in some measure by Miller v. California (1973); but, as Justice Scalia noted, Miller only added extra elements the government must show beyond this “dominant theme” constitutional requirement.) And the same applies to obscene-as-to-minors material.

Now this isn’t so for all First Amendment exceptions. Someone can be prosecuted for possessing child pornography even if that’s an isolated picture within a broader work. Likewise, someone can be sued (or prosecuted) for libel based on a libelous statement in a mostly nonlibelous work.

But when it comes to the obscenity exception, the law is settled: Isolated pornographic passages don’t make a work punishable.

UPDATE: A comment reminded me that I should elaborate a bit on the “dominant” point; in Ginzburg v. U.S. (1966) (not to be confused with Ginsberg v. N.Y. (1968), or Ginsburg, J. (1993-2020)), the Court noted that a work’s dominant theme could be evaluated not just based on what’s inside it but also based on how it’s marketed: “[I]n close cases evidence of pandering may be probative with respect to the nature of the material in question and thus satisfy the [obscenity] test,” with “pandering” defined as “the business of purveying textual or graphic matter openly advertised to appeal to the erotic interest of their customers.”

But the Court stressed that in that case, “each of these publications was created or exploited entirely on the basis of its appeal to prurient interests”; again, the focus is on the dominant appeal of the work, not just one incidental feature. (Ginzburg doesn’t seem to have been used much in recent years, but it has been cited favorably at times, so it still seems to be good law.)



Original Source Link

Latest News

What’s open and what’s closed on Good Friday 2024?

Good Friday is a conundrum for many people. Easter is such a major holiday in the Christian faith...

Apple sues former iOS engineer for allegedly leaking Vision Pro, Journal app details

Apple is suing a former employee for leaking confidential information, including unknown details about Apple’s Journal app, the...

Biden Confirms That Dark Brandon Is Real At Fundraiser With Clinton And Obama

President Biden confirmed that Dark Brandon is real during a fundraiser with former presidents Bill Clinton and Barack...

Rent prices across the U.S. grew in March, with one exception

 Ascentxmedia | E+ | Getty ImagesRent prices for one- and two-bedroom apartments grew in March for the first...

Must Read

Asus’ tiny 2.5-liter gaming NUC tentatively starts at $1,629 in the US

When Asus rescued Intel’s NUC brand of compact...

How to stay in shape in your 30s, 40s, and 50s

As spring rolls in with summer not far...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you