PoliticsEl Salvador's Latest Gang Crackdown Includes Human Rights Violations

El Salvador’s Latest Gang Crackdown Includes Human Rights Violations


Amid a wide-reaching government crackdown on organized criminal groups in the country, almost 2 percent of El Salvador’s adult population has been detained and at least 18 people have died in police custody, according to a new report from the human rights group Amnesty International.

The crackdown was initiated by President Nayib Bukele in March. It is aimed at suspected members of MS-13, also known as Mara Salvatrucha, and Barrio 18, both of which are street gangs that emerged in El Salvador following waves of mass deportations of Salvadoran immigrants from the United States in the 1980s and 1990s.

In addition to reports of arbitrary detentions, torture, and inhumane conditions in now-overcrowded prisons, the government has also reportedly targeted journalists, activists and even judicial officials, amounting to what Amnesty International is describing as “massive human rights violations.” According to Amnesty International’s report, El Salvador’s government has made arrests without “administrative or judicial arrest warrant[s]” and without catching defendants in the act of committing a crime; rather, arrests are based on a defendant’s prior criminal record or because they live in a community with a large gang population. Many arrestees have been denied access to legal representation and are held for weeks before seeing a judge.

The U.S. government, which has long played a role in El Salvador’s organized crime problem, has remained relatively silent. Barring one statement from Secretary of State Antony Blinken on April 10, and one answer by Blinken to a question at a press conference in Panama City on April 20, U.S. diplomatic institutions have largely responded with silence toward these reports. In neither statement did Blinken acknowledge how these gangs came to hold such sway in El Salvador, instead restating previous U.S. support of the Salvadoran government. “We continue to support El Salvador in its efforts to reduce the proliferation of gangs. Since 2008, we have invested $411 million to improve citizen security and help the Salvadoran government combat gang violence,” Blinken said in his April 10 statement.

“It’s ironic, because you could argue that 20 to 30 years later, the U.S. is now reaping the results of very mistaken policy from the 1980s,” says Harry Vanden, professor emeritus of political science and international studies at the University of South Florida and a leading expert on Central American gang violence. In Vanden’s view, a combination of heavy-handed U.S. interventions in support of El Salvador’s right-wing military junta during the 1980s and U.S. deportations of Salvadorans to an economically impoverished country just out of the throes of civil war set the stage for street gangs to explode in power, reach and influence. “[The street gangs] incorporated the violence and they have continued to build on it.”

In addition to waging paramilitary violence, gangs like MS-13 and Barrio 18 became a refuge for many deported Salvadorans, especially those who returned to the country after living for years in the United States. A 2017 World Bank study noted that 81 percent of deportees were men, and that many Salvadorans repatriated from the United States “return home poorer and with fewer resources to start over,” having drained their resources and social networks in order to make the initial journey north. They also face new stigmas associated with their deportations. Gangs provide support and act as substitute families. For these reasons, “solutions to this problem need to address social exclusion and lack of opportunity as much or more as they do the law enforcement challenges posed by the gang,” reads a report commissioned by the Department of Justice under former President Donald Trump.

El Salvador remains one of the world’s most dangerous countries, and taking on the gangs has remained a priority for Salvadoran governments since the end of the civil war. Previous governments have balanced mano dura, or heavy policing, with secret negotiations with gang leaders, at times reportedly bribing gangs in exchange for reduced homicides. As Salvadoran news outlet El Faro has reported, Bukele’s government was acting no differently before March 2022, trying to negotiate a similar truce to the one El Salvador’s government reached with the gangs in the early 2010s. However, negotiations broke down after the government arrested a group of MS-13 members who had been granted safe passage while they rode in a government-provided vehicle driven by a government-contracted driver. This perceived betrayal prompted an unprecedented explosion in homicides in which 87 people were killed by gang members in three days. Hence, the latest crackdown.

Some believe that the U.S. should use its soft power to hold the Salvadoran government accountable. “Rhetoric from the U.S. government that seeks to enforce the importance of Salvadoran civil society and independent media should be accompanied by clear action that supports these groups,” Ana María Méndez Dardón, a human rights lawyer and the Central America director at the Washington Office for Latin America, wrote in a recent analysis. However, others are skeptical that the U.S. can intervene effectively from a diplomatic or political perspective. “The idea that the U.S. can go in and remedy these problems is a false assumption that is a great deal of the problem,” Vanden says, pointing to negative perceptions of the U.S. in the region following decades of military interventions.

Foreign aid to El Salvador has also been fraught. A recent report by the Wilson Center sharply criticized U.S. assistance programs in the Northern Triangle region, which includes Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras, noting lack of coordination between aid providers and discrepancies between the design of aid programs and the on-the-ground realities. Throwing more money at the gang violence crisis in El Salvador will likely yield even fewer dividends. 

However, immigration reform provides a clear pathway for indirect intervention. Experts believe that the U.S. should negotiate bilateral labor agreements with El Salvador, similar to the ones Canada has with other Northern Triangle countries, as a long-term way to harness the benefits of migrants and create mutually-shared benefits for both countries. In the short term, they see improving access to H-2 visa programs as a key first step, to ensure that workers and employers alike can take advantage of the system and ultimately illegal migration can be reduced.

For a migrant deciding between the two, greater accessibility to H-2 visa programs would appear competitive compared to an unlawful pathway,” argued the Center for Global Development in a 2020 policy brief. That change in incentives would not only stymie the growth of gang cells in the United States, but would also improve the economic well-being of both the U.S. and El Salvador.



Original Source Link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

Beyond the Byline: Venture capital firms lure health system CEOs

What are the consequences for these health systems if they do not have a completed succession plan? Alex Kacik:...

Vogue on KBJ and ACB

The September issue of Vogue Magazine is a big deal. In the past, the publisher would boast of...

Oort cloud comets may spin themselves to death

Comets from the solar system’s deep freezer often don’t survive their first encounter with the sun. Now one...

Mortgage Demand Falls To New 22-Year Low As Housing Market Fuels Recession Fears

Topline Despite falling mortgage rates providing some relief to potential home buyers, mortgage applications fell to the lowest level...

Christina Hall’s Daughter Taylor Is Growing Up Fast – Look!

Where did the time go!? That’s what Christina Hall is wondering after going on a shopping trip with her...

Must Read

- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you