ScienceHappy the elephant: Why is a court deciding on...

Happy the elephant: Why is a court deciding on her personhood?


An animal rights group says that an elephant in the Bronx Zoo in New York is so intelligent she should be granted legal personhood, but a court has now issued a ruling saying otherwise



Life



14 June 2022

The Bronx Zoo

Happy the elephant will remain at the Bronx Zoo for the foreseeable future

Robert K. Chin – Storefronts/Alamy

A female Asian elephant at the Bronx Zoo is not legally considered a person, the New York Court of Appeals ruled today.

Happy has been embroiled in a years-long battle between animal rights activists and the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Bronx Zoo over the legality of her confinement. Here is everything you need to know about the case:

Who is Happy?

Happy has been a resident of the Bronx Zoo in New York for more than 45 years. The elephant, now in her 50s, was captured in the wild in Asia as a baby and relocated to the Bronx Zoo as a youngster.

She initially shared an enclosure with other elephants until their social differences proved unsafe. For the past 10 years, Happy has lived in a roughly 1-acre enclosure and has limited contact with the zoo’s other remaining pachyderms.

Why is there a court case about her?

The animal advocacy group Nonhuman Rights Project argues that highly intelligent animals like Happy should have some of the same legal rights as people.

In 2018, the group asserted that Happy’s confinement at the zoo violated the legal principle of habeas corpus, a right guaranteed by the the United States Constitution that prevents a person’s unlawful and indefinite imprisonment. The group argued that the same right should be extended to Happy and that she should be moved to a sanctuary.

The Bronx Zoo says that Happy shows all signs of being a well-cared-for elephant and says that the animal welfare organisation is using her as a pawn to advance its own agenda.

“They are not ‘freeing’ Happy as they purport, but arbitrarily demanding that she be uprooted from her home and transferred to another facility where they would prefer to see her live,” the zoo wrote in a statement last month. “Their concern is winning a legal argument, not what is best for Happy.”

What is the evidence behind the case?

The case for Happy’s personhood rests on her impressive cognitive abilities.

In 2005, Happy became the first elephant to pass the mirror self-recognition test where she observed her reflection and used her trunk to touch an X marked on her forehead. The ability is touted as an example of self-awareness, as only a few species including humans, apes and dolphins have passed the mirror test before.

“While no one disputes the impressive capabilities of elephants, we reject petitioner’s arguments that it is entitled to seek the remedy of habeas corpus on Happy’s behalf,” the chief judge of the recent ruling, Janet DiFiore, wrote in a statement. “Habeas corpus is a procedural vehicle intended to secure the liberty rights of human beings who are unlawfully restrained, not nonhuman animals.”

The zoo also notes that Happy has bonded closely with her caretakers and requires specific medical care that would be challenging to maintain in a sanctuary setting.

Are there other animal personhood cases?

A 2014 decision by the Supreme Court of India extended some personhood rights to animals, including dignity and intrinsic value of life.

The following year, an Argentinian court ruled in favour of a habeas corpus case for a solitary orangutan named Sandra. Sandra was the first ape to be deemed a “non-human person” and was afforded some of the same legal rights as people, though the ruling was later overturned. She was then relocated to a sanctuary in the US.

What will happen next?

Happy will stay at the Bronx Zoo for the foreseeable future, but the debate about personhood rights for animals isn’t over. As researchers learn more about animals’ emotions and abilities, animal welfare organisations may be inclined to take on more habeas corpus cases for highly intelligent species.

More on these topics:



Original Source Link

Latest News

ByteDance promised to sue if the U.S. bans TikTok. Legal experts weigh in on what it means for users

In the event of a lawsuit, the U.S. government would likely argue national security issues. Legislation forcing TikTok’s parent...

Morgan Stanley Moving to Start Bitcoin ETF Sales: Reports

Morgan Stanley, one of the world's largest investment banks with over $1.4 trillion in assets under management (AUM),...

US economy grew less than expected in first quarter at 1.6% rate

Stay informed with free updatesSimply sign up to the US economy myFT Digest -- delivered directly to your...

Spotify is still trying to get Apple to approve its EU iOS app updates

Spotify submitted a new version of its iOS app with in-app pricing information for users in the European...

Biden To Announce The Historic Creation Of 70,000 Good Paying Manufacturing Jobs

President Biden will announce a historic cutting-edge chip manufacturing investment that will create 70,000 good-paying jobs. According to a...

Can India build a world-leading computer chip industry from scratch?

India currently has a fairly small chip-manufacturing industry, but prime minister Narendra Modi wants the country to become...

Must Read

Building on the Success of Uniting for Ukraine

CBS News recently published an article reviewing...

These windpipe cells trigger coughs to keep water out of the lungs

Have you ever taken a gulp of water...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you