PoliticsNewsom Vetoes Legalizing 'Safe Consumption Sites' in California

Newsom Vetoes Legalizing ‘Safe Consumption Sites’ in California

On Monday, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill legalizing “safe consumption sites” in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Oakland. Safe consumption sites, also known as “safe injection sites,” are locations where individuals can use illegal drugs in a sanitary area with access to clean needles and staff who can administer drugs like naloxone, which can quickly treat an overdose. Proponents of the legislation argue that the sites are an important harm reduction tool, helping to prevent overdose deaths or the spread of certain diseases, like HIV, that can be spread through intravenous drug use.

“Safe injection sites aren’t intended to be some sort of magic solution to a chronic drug addiction crisis; they are intended to reduce the likelihood of users dying,” Reason’s Scott Shackford wrote after the bill’s passage in the state Legislature earlier this month.

Where safe consumption sites are legal, they have proved tremendously effective. As of 2019, one safe consumption site in Vancouver, Canada, has overseen more than 3.6 million instances of drug injection since its opening in 2003. At the site, staff responded to 6,440 overdoses with no deaths. A study examining the site’s operations from 2004 to 2008 predicted that, during that period, the site prevented up to 51 deaths. According to NPR, researchers also found no increase in drug usage in the surrounding area.

“Safe consumption sites have been in operation around the world for approximately 30 years, with great success and literally zero overdose deaths,” state Sen. Scott Wiener (D–San Francisco), who originally introduced the bill, told CBS Bay Area. “These sites are a proven strategy to reduce overdose deaths, pressure on emergency rooms, and public drug use, while expanding access to drug treatment”

However, Newsom seems unconvinced that safe consumption sites will help the state’s drug users. “I have long supported the cutting edge of harm reduction strategies,” Newsom wrote in a statement explaining his veto of the bill. “However, I am acutely concerned about the operations of safe injection sites without strong, engaged local leadership, and well-documented, vetted, and thoughtful operational and suitability plans.” Newsom further expressed concerns that the bill could lead to “a world of unintended consequences… worsening drug consumption challenges in [Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Oakland] is not a risk we can take.”

“It’s tremendously frustrating that safe injection sites have met continued resistance at the federal and state levels, including in supposedly liberal states like California,” Geoffroy Lawrence, the managing director of drug policy at Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes this website), tells Reason. “While safe injection sites may sound counterintuitive to some people as an effective means to combat addiction, there’s no arguing with the data. Results from other countries have shown that safe injection sites lead to a reduction in overdose deaths and transmission rates of infectious disease and an increase in the number of individuals seeking addiction recovery.”

It is possible that Newsom’s veto of the bill has little to do with the efficacy of safe injection sites and instead is the result of his preparation for a possible presidential run in 2024. On July 4, he placed political ads on several Florida television stations, criticizing Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, also a possible presidential contender. With cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles gaining attention in national media for their homelessness crisis (which is associated with drug use), Newsom could be eager to present a more anti-drug, even “tough on crime” image.

Newsom’s presidential ambitions, or simply his desire to appear less soft on crime, might be getting in the way of a safe and effective public health strategy for preventing drug overdoses.

“The American approach to the drug war has historically been about restricting supply when changing demand was always the better approach,” said Lawrence. “That’s what so-called ‘harm reduction’ policies, including safe injection sites, are all about.”

Original Source Link

Latest News

AI version of Tom Hanks used in dental plan video without permission

Tom Hanks warned us this would happen. Hanks cautioned his fans on Sunday that a video promoting a dental...

Fed inspector blames crypto focus, nepotism for Silvergate Bank collapse

Crypto-friendly Silvergate Bank ultimately collapsed this year due to over-dependence on risky crypto deposits and nepotism that led...

FirstFT: Rishi Sunak under fire over plan to axe HS2’s northern leg

Receive free Global Economy updatesWe’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Global Economy...

X Social Media is suing X, a social media company

It was bound to happen eventually: a company has filed a lawsuit in federal court against Elon Musk’s...

3 Key Principles Of Successful Wayfinding In Healthcare Facilities

The challenges of designing effective wayfinding for healthcare facilities are considerable. As with other commercial building projects—whether it’s...

Rachel Maddow Slays Bothsidesism

Rachel Maddow took on the lazy thinking and punditry that both the Democratic and Republican Parties are the...

Must Read

U.S. Officials Say Travis King, Who Crossed Into North Korea, Is In American Custody

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The American soldier...

Which foods make the smelliest farts?

Nothing clears a room like a smelly fart....
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you