HealthcareOpponents of federal vaccine mandate seek rehearing

Opponents of federal vaccine mandate seek rehearing


A federal appeals court is being asked to reconsider its decision allowing the Biden administration to require that federal employees get vaccinated against COVID-19.

A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last month vacated a lower court ruling blocking the mandate and ordered dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the policy, which was ordered by President Joe Biden in September.

However, that 2-1 ruling by the appellate panel doesn’t take effect until May 31. On Saturday, opponents of the mandate, led by a group called Feds for Medical Freedom, filed a petition asking that the April ruling be vacated and that the full 17-member court hear new arguments in the case.

On Monday, the 5th Circuit asked the government to respond by June 2; it was unclear if the court would take any action before then.

Biden issued an order Sept. 9 that more than 3.5 million federal executive branch workers undergo vaccination, with no option to get regularly tested instead, unless they secured approved medical or religious exemptions.

Not a Modern Healthcare subscriber? Sign up today.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown, who was appointed to the District Court for the Southern District of Texas by then-President Donald Trump, issued a nationwide injunction against the requirement in January. At the time, the White House said 98% of federal workers were already vaccinated.

In February, one 5th Circuit panel refused to block Brown’s ruling pending appeal. After hearing arguments in March, a different panel ruled 2-1 that Brown didn’t have jurisdiction in the case and those challenging the requirement could have pursued administrative remedies under Civil Service law.

Judges Carl Stewart and James Dennis, both nominated to the court by Democratic President Bill Clinton, were in the majority. Judge Rhesa Barksdale, a senior judge nominated by Republican President George H.W. Bush, dissented, saying the relief the challengers sought does not fall under the Civil Service Reform Act cited by the administration.



Original Source Link

Latest News

‘Noticeable Progress’ In Cease-Fire Talks, But Israel Downplays Chances Of Ending War

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — A Hamas delegation was in Cairo on Saturday as Egyptian state media reported...

Wisconsin Teacher Caught ‘Making Out’ With 11-Year-Old Student Before Her Wedding!

A Wisconsin teacher has been arrested and charged with first-degree child sexual assault after being caught with one...

3 key investing tips for early-career professionals

Young professionals who set up good investing habits can experience lifelong benefits. Here are the investing behaviors you...

6 Reasons To Own Bitcoin In Retirement

Originally published on Unchained.com.Unchained is the official US Collaborative Custody partner of Bitcoin Magazine and an integral sponsor...

New form of bond emerges from Sri Lanka’s $13bn restructuring talks

Negotiations to finally bring an end to Sri Lanka’s long-running $13bn debt default could result in an innovative...

Komoot is helping me get back on my bike after a long hiatus

Getting into cycling in my late thirties has been humbling. I’m responsible for my own medical costs, which...

Must Read

Sticky German inflation curbs investors’ ECB rate cut expectations

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor...

Bhad Bhabie Dissolved All Her Filler! See Her Natural New Look!

Bhad Bhabie has a bold and natural new...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you