WorldSupreme Court allows Trump’s ballroom construction to continue for...

Supreme Court allows Trump’s ballroom construction to continue for now : NPR


President Trump holds papers that show a rendering of his proposed White House ballroom. He is wearing a suit with a blue tie and is sitting in an armchair.

President Trump displays a rendering of his proposed $250 million White House ballroom on Oct. 22, 2025.

Alex Wong/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Alex Wong/Getty Images

The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump can — for now — move forward with construction of his ballroom on the site of the former East Wing of the White House without needing approval from Congress.

The new ballroom is estimated to cost taxpayers at least $300 million, despite the president saying repeatedly that taxpayers would not foot the bill.

The ruling comes after months of back-and-forth between the Trump administration and the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which sued to stop the construction of the ballroom. The nonprofit organization has argued that the president must get approval from Congress to build over the East Wing, the side that held offices for the first lady.

The ballroom is expected to be a 90,000-square-foot addition to the White House and twice the size of the main part of the White House complex.

Trump has argued for months that the new ballroom is a necessity, often pointing to the lack of space to host events with foreign dignitaries. He has also said that the ballroom will house critical national security benefits, including bomb shelters, a hospital, sniper nests and a drone port.

The Supreme Court had until Friday to weigh in after lower courts had differing rulings on the ballroom for the last few months.

In a brief order, signed by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court stayed the lower court ruling to pause construction.

In its brief filed earlier this week, the trust asserted that if the Supreme Court allowed construction to continue at this time, the court was effectively ending the case.

“Rather than obtain permission from Congress, Petitioners have instead decided to try to outrun judicial review” by accelerating construction. “It is clear that in Petitioners’ view, if the Court grants their stay application, this case is over—despite every court to have reviewed their project having found it to be patently unlawful, and no matter the fact that this Court has not reviewed those decisions on the merits,” the brief states.



Original Source Link

Latest News

Trump Busted Selling Pardons – by Jason Easley

Since Trump’s first administration, stories have circulated that the president abused the presidential pardon power to sell pardons....

Thunderquakes can act like X-rays for the ground

“Thunderquakes” ho! Using intense sound waves generated by thunder, scientists created maps of the shallow geology beneath a...

Why Buyers Love Cape Cod-Style Homes

When it comes to home styles, Cape Cod-style houses have stood the test of time. Instantly recognizable by...

Jessica Simpson Netflix Documentary: Release Date, Details & Everything to Know

More than 20 years after 'Newlyweds' made her a reality TV fixture, the singer is letting Netflix cameras...

Amazon hiked prices on Echo, Fire TV, Kindle, eero to offset ‘significant increases’ in memory costs

Amazon has raised prices for several of its first-party devices, including its Echo smart speakers and Fire TV...

Binance Theft Lawsuit Can Proceed In Federal Court, Appeals Panel Rules

A US appeals court has allowed a proposed Binance-related theft lawsuit to proceed in federal court, rejecting a...

Must Read

How Colossal is incubating an empire of startups

One spin-off just raised another $20 million. Colossal Biosciences...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you